Loading…
Most bad decisions are good answers to the wrong question. If you can't write it in one sentence, you're not ready.
A “probably” from your manager feels like a yes by Friday. Written under Assumed, it stays a probably.
Nobody does this unprompted, and often the deciding fact is a phone call away. If it's missing, the answer is “not yet”.
Otherwise the option you secretly prefer brings the best facts. Waiting and doing nothing are options too.
With only one ending, you have to invent certainty. A leaning stays a leaning. It doesn't get rounded up.
After you choose, everything looks like support for the choice. New facts go back in at Evidence.
An invented one. A small firm is choosing between Asha and Ravi for an operations lead. Everyone likes Ravi because he “can handle chaos”, but nobody has called his references. So on a BEAR sheet that goes under Assumed, not Known.
The Missing list gets one line: how each of them has run things with no team behind them. That's two phone calls, one for each. The answer moves from “Ravi, by lunch” to “not yet, two calls this week”.
BEAR isn't the result of a published study, and we don't claim one. It's built on three old practices: write the decision down, separate what you know from what you assume, and name what would change your mind before you act. We added the order, the five lists and the three endings.
Bear Decide shows all its working, so you can check the reasoning yourself.
It doesn't make a decision right. It makes the reasoning visible, so a wrong one is easier to catch. It doesn't replace knowing the subject, and a person still owns the call. For anything legal, medical, structural or tax, it prepares you for the expert.